Which of the following is NOT an alternative to guardianship?

The correct choice highlights that executive authority is not considered an alternative to guardianship. Guardianship is often used when an individual is deemed unable to manage their personal or financial affairs due to incapacity. The alternatives typically focus on empowering individuals to retain some control and decision-making ability, which executive authority does not do effectively.

Teaching is an alternative because it aims to educate individuals on how to handle their own matters, promoting independence. Power of attorney is a recognized alternative as it allows someone to make decisions on behalf of another while still respecting their autonomy. Trusts provide a framework for managing assets without the need for guardianship, allowing individuals to specify how their affairs should be handled in a way that safeguards their interests.

In contrast, executive authority generally refers to the power to enforce laws or make decisions at a high level within an organization or government, which does not directly translate to providing personal support or alternatives for individual decision-making as seen in guardianship scenarios. Thus, it stands out as not being a viable alternative to guardianship.